MC

1e4a_fc79

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 81 1.000
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18 8.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 46 (46-30)²⁄ 46 5.565
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 15 1.667
(sum) χ² =  16.232

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 46 (46-30)²⁄ 30 8.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 10 2.500
(sum) χ² =  16.733

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)⁄ 90 -0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)⁄ 30 -0.400
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 46 (46-30)⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)⁄ 10 0.500
(sum) χ² =  0.533


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.232 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.232 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

6574_6658

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84² 0.005
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31² 0.001
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 39 (39-30)²⁄ 39² 0.053
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄  0.444
(sum) χ² =  0.504

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84 0.429
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31 0.032
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 39 (39-30)²⁄ 39 2.077
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 6 2.667
(sum) χ² =  5.204

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 39 (39-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  4.733


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.504 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 5.204 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.504 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 5.204 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

a9cb_5983

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)⁄ 90 -0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 37 (37-30)⁄ 30 0.233
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)⁄ 30 -0.067
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.289

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 37 (37-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  2.711

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83 0.590
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 37 (37-30)²⁄ 37 1.324
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28 0.143
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  2.391


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.391 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.391 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

3a0f_9cb3

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80² 0.016
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18² 0.444
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44² 0.101
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.759

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80 1.250
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18 8.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44 4.455
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  17.260

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 90 1.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  18.844


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.759 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.260 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 18.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.759 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.260 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 18.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

52d2_5dd7

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 82² 0.010
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40² 0.062
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.520

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)⁄ 90 -0.089
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)⁄ 30 0.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.711

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 90 0.711
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  13.778


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.520 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 13.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.520 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 13.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

b315_e3d4

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 39 (39-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  12.978

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83² 0.007
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 39 (39-30)²⁄ 39² 0.053
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.508

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)⁄ 90 -0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 39 (39-30)⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.689


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.508 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.508 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

3d5b_162d

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.867

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93² 0.001
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34² 0.014
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25² 0.040
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄  0.062
(sum) χ² =  0.117

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93 0.097
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34 0.471
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25 1.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 8 0.500
(sum) χ² =  2.067


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.117 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.117 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

0f1c_a2f6

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 90 1.344
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 17 (17-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 30 9.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  21.511

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79 1.532
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 17 (17-30)²⁄ 17 9.941
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 47 6.149
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  20.504

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79² 0.019
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 17 (17-30)²⁄ 17² 0.585
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 47² 0.131
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17² 0.170
(sum) χ² =  0.905


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 20.504 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.905 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 20.504 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.905 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

1466_af7f

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 90 0.711
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  9.778

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)⁄ 90 -0.089
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)⁄ 30 -0.267
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)⁄ 30 0.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)⁄ 10 0.600
(sum) χ² =  0.578

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 82 0.780
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40 2.500
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16 2.250
(sum) χ² =  8.440


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 8.440 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 8.440 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

8fc5_92db

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 73 (73-90)²⁄ 73 3.959
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27 0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42 3.429
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  11.276

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 73 (73-90)⁄ 90 -0.189
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)⁄ 30 -0.100
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)⁄ 30 0.400
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.911

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 73 (73-90)²⁄ 90 3.211
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  14.711


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.276 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 14.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.276 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 14.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

ba15_d63c

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83² 0.007
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 41² 0.072
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13² 0.053
(sum) χ² =  0.225

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)⁄ 90 -0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)⁄ 30 -0.233
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)⁄ 30 0.367
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)⁄ 10 0.300
(sum) χ² =  0.356

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  7.111


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.225 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.356 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 7.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.225 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.356 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 7.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

4422_afcd

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)⁄ 90 0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)⁄ 30 -0.100
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)⁄ 30 -0.267
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  0.111

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 97² 0.005
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14² 0.082
(sum) χ² =  0.231

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  4.578


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.231 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.231 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

063a_1aa3

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  6.511

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 94² 0.002
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29² 0.001
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21² 0.184
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16² 0.141
(sum) χ² =  0.327

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)⁄ 90 0.044
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 21 (21-30)⁄ 30 -0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)⁄ 10 0.600
(sum) χ² =  0.311


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.327 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.327 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

eb79_a057

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 90 0.711
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  5.978

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 82 0.780
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 41 2.951
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25 1.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  5.065

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)⁄ 90 -0.089
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 41 (41-30)⁄ 30 0.367
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 25 (25-30)⁄ 30 -0.167
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.311


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 5.978 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 5.065 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 5.978 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 5.065 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

daa0_e581

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)⁄ 90 -0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.289

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.511

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83² 0.007
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34² 0.014
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31² 0.001
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12² 0.028
(sum) χ² =  0.050


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.050 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.050 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

b8c4_9763

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 77² 0.029
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21² 0.184
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43² 0.091
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  0.528

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 90 1.878
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  18.311

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 77 2.195
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21 3.857
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43 3.930
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  14.245


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.528 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 18.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 14.245 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.528 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 18.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 14.245 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

0fc4_e2c4

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 90 1.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 46 (46-30)²⁄ 30 8.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  18.044

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)⁄ 90 -0.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)⁄ 30 -0.400
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 46 (46-30)⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)⁄ 10 0.600
(sum) χ² =  0.622

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80 1.250
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18 8.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 46 (46-30)²⁄ 46 5.565
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16 2.250
(sum) χ² =  17.065


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 18.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 17.065 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 18.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 17.065 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

57c4_4ecb

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93 0.097
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 38 1.684
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 7 1.286
(sum) χ² =  5.976

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  5.267

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93² 0.001
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 38² 0.044
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄  0.184
(sum) χ² =  0.361


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 5.976 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 5.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 5.976 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 5.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

1532_ef9f

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 78 (78-90)²⁄ 78² 0.024
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44² 0.101
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.572

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 78 (78-90)²⁄ 78 1.846
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44 4.455
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  14.856

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 78 (78-90)²⁄ 90 1.600
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  17.867


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.572 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 14.856 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 17.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.572 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 14.856 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 17.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

010b_95ce

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 90 1.878
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 39 (39-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 36 (36-30)²⁄ 30 1.200
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  6.178

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)⁄ 90 -0.144
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 39 (39-30)⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 36 (36-30)⁄ 30 0.200
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)⁄ 10 -0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.156

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 77 2.195
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 39 (39-30)²⁄ 39 2.077
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 36 (36-30)²⁄ 36 1.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 8 0.500
(sum) χ² =  5.772


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 5.772 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 5.772 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

f641_7618

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 90 1.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  13.511

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)⁄ 90 -0.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)⁄ 30 -0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)⁄ 30 0.400
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)⁄ 10 0.700
(sum) χ² =  0.689

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80² 0.016
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21² 0.184
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42² 0.082
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17² 0.170
(sum) χ² =  0.450


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 13.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.450 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 13.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.450 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

96aa_952f

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 90 1.878
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  6.844

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)⁄ 90 -0.144
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)⁄ 30 0.367
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)⁄ 10 -0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.156

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 77 2.195
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34 0.471
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 41 2.951
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 8 0.500
(sum) χ² =  6.117


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 6.117 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 6.117 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

2760_969e

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 86 0.186
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21 3.857
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 35 0.714
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  8.313

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  10.111

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 86² 0.002
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21² 0.184
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 35² 0.020
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.404


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 8.313 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 10.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.404 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 8.313 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 10.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.404 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

0554_ab72

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 90 2.844
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 30 7.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 53 (53-30)²⁄ 30 17.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  34.378

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 74 3.459
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 15 15.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 53 (53-30)²⁄ 53 9.981
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  31.996

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 74² 0.047
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 15² 1.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 53 (53-30)²⁄ 53² 0.188
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  1.433


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 34.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 31.996 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.433 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 34.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 31.996 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.433 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

5335_aea9

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 30 7.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  16.000

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)⁄ 90 -0.033
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)⁄ 30 -0.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)⁄ 30 0.400
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)⁄ 10 0.600
(sum) χ² =  0.467

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 87² 0.001
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 15² 1.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42² 0.082
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16² 0.141
(sum) χ² =  1.223


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.000 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.223 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.000 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.223 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

4bc6_f1a9

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 68 (68-90)²⁄ 68 7.118
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23 2.130
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)²⁄ 50 8.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  21.511

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 68 (68-90)⁄ 90 -0.244
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)⁄ 30 -0.233
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)⁄ 30 0.667
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  1.089

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 68 (68-90)²⁄ 90 5.378
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)²⁄ 30 13.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  28.444


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.089 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 28.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.089 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 28.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

f725_653b

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 90 1.344
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 45 (45-30)²⁄ 30 7.500
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  11.378

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79² 0.019
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 45 (45-30)²⁄ 45² 0.111
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13² 0.053
(sum) χ² =  0.276

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79 1.532
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23 2.130
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 45 (45-30)²⁄ 45 5.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13 0.692
(sum) χ² =  9.354


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.276 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 9.354 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.276 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 9.354 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

1618_0296

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)⁄ 90 -0.122
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)⁄ 30 -0.367
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)⁄ 30 0.567
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)⁄ 10 0.500
(sum) χ² =  0.578

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 90 1.344
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 30 9.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 10 2.500
(sum) χ² =  17.511

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79 1.532
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 19 6.368
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 47 6.149
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 15 1.667
(sum) χ² =  15.716


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 15.716 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 15.716 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

57af_61a9

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)⁄ 90 -0.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)⁄ 30 -0.400
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)⁄ 30 0.433
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  0.822

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80 1.250
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18 8.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43 3.930
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  17.443

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 90 1.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  19.644


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.822 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.443 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 19.644 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.822 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.443 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 19.644 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

15ab_3923

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)⁄ 90 -0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)⁄ 30 -0.267
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)⁄ 30 0.267
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)⁄ 10 0.700
(sum) χ² =  0.622

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  9.711

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83 0.590
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 38 1.684
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  8.066


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 9.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 8.066 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 9.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 8.066 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

5235_6414

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93² 0.001
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 33 (33-30)²⁄ 33² 0.008
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12² 0.028
(sum) χ² =  0.169

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 33 (33-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  2.933

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93 0.097
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 33 (33-30)²⁄ 33 0.273
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  3.612


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.169 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.612 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.169 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.612 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

3f25_86d4

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 98 (98-90)²⁄ 98 0.653
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28 0.143
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26 0.615
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 8 0.500
(sum) χ² =  1.911

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 98 (98-90)²⁄ 98² 0.007
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28² 0.005
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26² 0.024
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄  0.062
(sum) χ² =  0.098

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 98 (98-90)²⁄ 90 0.711
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.778


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.098 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.098 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

7a55_56ae

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)⁄ 90 -0.089
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)⁄ 30 -0.367
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)⁄ 30 0.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  0.778

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 90 0.711
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  16.178

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 82 0.780
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 19 6.368
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40 2.500
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  13.912


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 13.912 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 13.912 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

43a2_68ff

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 30 (30-30)²⁄ 30 0.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.333

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96 0.375
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 30 (30-30)²⁄ 30 0.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26 0.615
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 8 0.500
(sum) χ² =  1.490

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)⁄ 90 0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 30 (30-30)⁄ 30 0.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)⁄ 30 -0.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)⁄ 10 -0.200
(sum) χ² =  -0.267


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.490 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.490 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

5b74_814a

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 10 2.500
(sum) χ² =  11.733

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)⁄ 90 -0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)⁄ 30 -0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)⁄ 30 0.433
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)⁄ 10 0.500
(sum) χ² =  0.533

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 81² 0.012
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21² 0.184
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43² 0.091
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 15² 0.111
(sum) χ² =  0.399


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.399 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.399 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

a2f0_acb0

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 30 1.200
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  2.133

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96 0.375
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 24 1.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28 0.143
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  2.351

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)⁄ 90 0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)⁄ 30 -0.200
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)⁄ 30 -0.067
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.000


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.133 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.351 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.000 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.133 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.351 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.000 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

3abe_e3e4

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83 0.590
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 33 (33-30)²⁄ 33 0.273
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 15 1.667
(sum) χ² =  2.564

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)⁄ 90 -0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 33 (33-30)⁄ 30 0.100
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)⁄ 10 0.500
(sum) χ² =  0.489

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 33 (33-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 10 2.500
(sum) χ² =  3.378


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.564 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.564 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

2231_ad74

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 85 (85-90)²⁄ 90 0.278
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  11.044

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 85 (85-90)²⁄ 85² 0.003
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34² 0.014
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  0.374

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 85 (85-90)²⁄ 85 0.294
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34 0.471
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  7.937


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.374 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 7.937 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.374 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 7.937 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

431d_a5bf

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 95 (95-90)²⁄ 90 0.278
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.511

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 95 (95-90)²⁄ 95 0.263
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27 0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26 0.615
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  1.545

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 95 (95-90)²⁄ 95² 0.003
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26² 0.024
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12² 0.028
(sum) χ² =  0.067


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.545 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.545 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

9c35_4ac9

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 87² 0.001
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 24² 0.062
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 35² 0.020
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14² 0.082
(sum) χ² =  0.166

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 30 1.200
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  3.733

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)⁄ 90 -0.033
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)⁄ 30 -0.200
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)⁄ 30 0.167
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  0.333


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.166 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.166 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

6483_b191

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 86 0.186
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34 0.471
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  7.121

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  9.244

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 86² 0.002
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 34 (34-30)²⁄ 34² 0.014
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.346


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 7.121 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.346 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 7.121 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.346 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

d238_39cb

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 97 0.505
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23 2.130
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27 0.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13 0.692
(sum) χ² =  3.661

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  3.378

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 97² 0.005
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13² 0.053
(sum) χ² =  0.163


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.661 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.163 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.661 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.163 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

dd07_254b

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 81² 0.012
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29² 0.001
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 35² 0.020
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 15² 0.111
(sum) χ² =  0.145

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)⁄ 90 -0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)⁄ 30 0.167
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)⁄ 10 0.500
(sum) χ² =  0.533

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 15 (15-10)²⁄ 10 2.500
(sum) χ² =  4.267


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.145 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.145 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

d413_d84f

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79² 0.019
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40² 0.062
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  0.438

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 90 1.344
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  14.911

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)⁄ 90 -0.122
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)⁄ 30 -0.267
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)⁄ 30 0.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  0.844


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.438 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 14.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.438 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 14.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

02eb_49b1

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96² 0.004
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29² 0.001
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄  0.062
(sum) χ² =  0.080

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)⁄ 90 0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)⁄ 30 -0.100
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)⁄ 10 -0.200
(sum) χ² =  -0.267

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.133


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.080 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.133 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.080 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.133 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

7407_fbe1

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96² 0.004
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26² 0.024
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 24² 0.062
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14² 0.082
(sum) χ² =  0.172

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 30 1.200
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  3.733

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96 0.375
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26 0.615
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 24 1.500
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14 1.143
(sum) χ² =  3.633


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.172 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.633 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.172 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.633 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

0bf5_ea6f

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 74 3.459
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 19 6.368
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 49 (49-30)²⁄ 49 7.367
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  20.751

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 90 2.844
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 49 (49-30)²⁄ 30 12.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  25.311

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 74² 0.047
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 19² 0.335
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 49 (49-30)²⁄ 49² 0.150
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.730


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.751 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 25.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.730 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.751 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 25.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.730 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

b988_88c7

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 13 (13-30)²⁄ 30 9.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 30 9.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  28.267

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)⁄ 90 -0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 13 (13-30)⁄ 30 -0.567
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)⁄ 30 0.567
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  0.800

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 81² 0.012
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 13 (13-30)²⁄ 13² 1.710
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 47² 0.131
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  2.078


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 28.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.800 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.078 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 28.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.800 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.078 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

0bba_edcb

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 87 0.103
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 15 15.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 41 2.951
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  20.937

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 30 7.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  16.533

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)⁄ 90 -0.033
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)⁄ 30 -0.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 41 (41-30)⁄ 30 0.367
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)⁄ 10 0.700
(sum) χ² =  0.533


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.937 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.937 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

0e1b_9dcc

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96 0.375
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28 0.143
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23 2.130
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13 0.692
(sum) χ² =  3.341

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96² 0.004
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28² 0.005
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13² 0.053
(sum) χ² =  0.155

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  3.067


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.341 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.155 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.341 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.155 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

9674_ddab

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 101 (101-90)²⁄ 101² 0.012
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 24² 0.062
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28² 0.005
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄  0.184
(sum) χ² =  0.263

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 101 (101-90)²⁄ 90 1.344
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)²⁄ 30 1.200
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  3.578

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 101 (101-90)⁄ 90 0.122
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 24 (24-30)⁄ 30 -0.200
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 28 (28-30)⁄ 30 -0.067
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)⁄ 10 -0.300
(sum) χ² =  -0.444


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.263 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.263 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

f1a5_c777

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 90 2.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 45 (45-30)²⁄ 30 7.500
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  16.711

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76 2.579
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 45 (45-30)²⁄ 45 5.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  13.370

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76² 0.034
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 45 (45-30)²⁄ 45² 0.111
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17² 0.170
(sum) χ² =  0.447


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 13.370 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.447 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 13.370 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.447 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

4235_8762

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96² 0.004
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25² 0.040
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31² 0.001
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄  0.062
(sum) χ² =  0.107

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)⁄ 90 0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)⁄ 30 -0.167
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)⁄ 10 -0.200
(sum) χ² =  -0.267

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.667


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.107 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.107 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

07fb_19e2

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)⁄ 90 0.044
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)⁄ 30 -0.067
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)⁄ 10 -0.300
(sum) χ² =  -0.289

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  1.244

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 94 0.170
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28 0.143
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31 0.032
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 7 1.286
(sum) χ² =  1.631


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.289 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.244 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.631 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.289 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.244 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.631 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

d528_3e9f

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79² 0.019
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 47² 0.131
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14² 0.082
(sum) χ² =  0.482

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)⁄ 90 -0.122
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)⁄ 30 0.567
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  0.511

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 90 1.344
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 30 9.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  15.911


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.482 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 15.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.482 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 15.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

1a7f_80b2

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76 2.579
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25 1.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 47 6.149
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  10.061

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 90 2.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)²⁄ 30 9.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  13.044

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)⁄ 90 -0.156
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)⁄ 30 -0.167
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 47 (47-30)⁄ 30 0.567
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.444


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 10.061 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 13.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 10.061 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 13.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

6f2c_939e

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 74 3.459
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23 2.130
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44 4.455
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  14.308

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)²⁄ 90 2.844
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  19.111

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 74 (74-90)⁄ 90 -0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)⁄ 30 -0.233
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)⁄ 30 0.467
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  0.956


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 14.308 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 19.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.956 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 14.308 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 19.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.956 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

96b5_2a48

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  1.778

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 97 0.505
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27 0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 7 1.286
(sum) χ² =  2.159

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 97² 0.005
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29² 0.001
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄  0.184
(sum) χ² =  0.202


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.159 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.202 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.159 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.202 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

db5a_84ef

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 75 (75-90)²⁄ 75² 0.040
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 49 (49-30)²⁄ 49² 0.150
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16² 0.141
(sum) χ² =  0.581

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 75 (75-90)²⁄ 75 3.000
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 49 (49-30)²⁄ 49 7.367
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16 2.250
(sum) χ² =  17.617

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 75 (75-90)²⁄ 90 2.500
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 49 (49-30)²⁄ 30 12.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  21.467


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.581 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.617 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 21.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.581 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.617 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 21.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

1d61_8db6

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)⁄ 90 -0.033
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 12 (12-30)⁄ 30 -0.600
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)⁄ 30 0.433
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.600

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 87² 0.001
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 12 (12-30)²⁄ 12² 2.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43² 0.091
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  2.540

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 12 (12-30)²⁄ 30 10.800
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  22.933


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.540 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 22.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.540 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 22.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

c002_d0b2

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)⁄ 90 0.033
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)⁄ 30 -0.167
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 30 (30-30)⁄ 30 0.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.067

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 30 (30-30)²⁄ 30 0.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  1.333

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93² 0.001
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25² 0.040
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 30 (30-30)²⁄ 30² 0.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12² 0.028
(sum) χ² =  0.069


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.069 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.069 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

8712_67c3

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)⁄ 90 0.033
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)⁄ 30 -0.067
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)⁄ 30 0.167
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 4 (4-10)⁄ 10 -0.600
(sum) χ² =  -0.467

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 93 0.097
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28 0.143
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 35 0.714
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 4 (4-10)²⁄ 4 9.000
(sum) χ² =  9.954

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 93 (93-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 35 (35-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 4 (4-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  4.667


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 9.954 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 9.954 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

04f1_ca4a

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 67 (67-90)⁄ 90 -0.256
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 55 (55-30)⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  1.044

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 67 (67-90)²⁄ 67 7.896
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 55 (55-30)²⁄ 55 11.364
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  27.815

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 67 (67-90)²⁄ 90 5.878
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 55 (55-30)²⁄ 30 20.833
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  36.444


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 27.815 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 36.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 27.815 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 36.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

afa7_47b5

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 81² 0.012
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40² 0.062
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12² 0.028
(sum) χ² =  0.115

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 81 1.000
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40 2.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27 0.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  4.167

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  4.933


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.115 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 4.167 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.115 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 4.167 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

4ca0_2449

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)⁄ 90 -0.122
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)⁄ 30 0.467
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)⁄ 10 0.700
(sum) χ² =  0.711

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 79 1.532
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44 4.455
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  13.869

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 79 (79-90)²⁄ 90 1.344
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  16.111


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 13.869 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 16.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 13.869 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 16.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

a8bb_bc42

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76² 0.034
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25² 0.040
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42² 0.082
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17² 0.170
(sum) χ² =  0.325

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 90 2.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  12.711

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76 2.579
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25 1.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42 3.429
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  9.890


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 12.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 9.890 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 12.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 9.890 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

5ec9_fae3

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 90 1.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  12.978

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)⁄ 90 -0.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)⁄ 30 -0.267
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)⁄ 30 0.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.756

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80 1.250
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40 2.500
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  10.215


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.756 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.215 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.756 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.215 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

41db_acfb

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84 0.429
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 14 (14-30)²⁄ 14 18.286
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44 4.455
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  26.724

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)⁄ 90 -0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 14 (14-30)⁄ 30 -0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)⁄ 30 0.467
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.667

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 14 (14-30)²⁄ 30 8.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  21.867


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 26.724 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 21.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 26.724 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 21.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

1efb_ccf8

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 86 0.186
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 38 1.684
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16 2.250
(sum) χ² =  9.120

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)⁄ 90 -0.044
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)⁄ 30 0.267
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)⁄ 10 0.600
(sum) χ² =  0.489

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  9.244


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 9.120 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 9.120 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

737d_fd5a

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)⁄ 90 -0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)⁄ 30 -0.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)⁄ 30 0.467
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)⁄ 10 0.700
(sum) χ² =  0.600

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84 0.429
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 15 15.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44 4.455
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  22.765

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 15 (15-30)²⁄ 30 7.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  19.333


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 22.765 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 19.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 22.765 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 19.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

5645_1286

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 94 0.170
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 32 (32-30)²⁄ 32 0.125
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  3.538

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)⁄ 90 0.044
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 32 (32-30)⁄ 30 0.067
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)⁄ 30 -0.267
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  0.044

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 32 (32-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  2.844


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.538 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.538 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

1e32_86a3

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 86 0.186
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31 0.032
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31 0.032
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12 0.333
(sum) χ² =  0.584

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  0.644

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 86 (86-90)²⁄ 86² 0.002
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31² 0.001
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31² 0.001
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12² 0.028
(sum) χ² =  0.032


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.584 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.644 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.032 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.584 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.644 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.032 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

aa52_4306

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)⁄ 90 -0.033
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)⁄ 30 -0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 33 (33-30)⁄ 30 0.100
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  0.333

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 87 0.103
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26 0.615
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 33 (33-30)²⁄ 33 0.273
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14 1.143
(sum) χ² =  2.134

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 87 (87-90)²⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 33 (33-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  2.533


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.134 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.134 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

2538_b6a0

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76² 0.034
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18² 0.444
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 48 (48-30)²⁄ 48² 0.141
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.817

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76 2.579
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18 8.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 48 (48-30)²⁄ 48 6.750
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  20.885

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 90 2.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 48 (48-30)²⁄ 30 10.800
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  24.178


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.817 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 20.885 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 24.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.817 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 20.885 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 24.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

26c9_f0f8

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 72 (72-90)²⁄ 72 4.500
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27 0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42 3.429
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  12.525

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 72 (72-90)²⁄ 90 3.600
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  16.800

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 72 (72-90)²⁄ 72² 0.062
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42² 0.082
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  0.381


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.525 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.800 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.381 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.525 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.800 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.381 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

4871_3654

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 85 (85-90)²⁄ 85 0.294
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 19 6.368
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43 3.930
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 13 0.692
(sum) χ² =  11.285

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 85 (85-90)⁄ 90 -0.056
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)⁄ 30 -0.367
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)⁄ 30 0.433
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)⁄ 10 0.300
(sum) χ² =  0.311

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 85 (85-90)²⁄ 90 0.278
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 13 (13-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  10.844


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.285 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.285 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

e7dc_3061

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  2.067

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)⁄ 90 0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)⁄ 10 -0.400
(sum) χ² =  -0.400

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96 0.375
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 6 2.667
(sum) χ² =  3.111


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

a580_553d

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 99 (99-90)⁄ 90 0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)⁄ 30 -0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)⁄ 10 -0.400
(sum) χ² =  -0.467

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 99 (99-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  3.067

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 99 (99-90)²⁄ 99² 0.008
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26² 0.024
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29² 0.001
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄  0.444
(sum) χ² =  0.478


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.478 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.478 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

38b9_caf8

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 73 (73-90)²⁄ 90 3.211
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)²⁄ 30 13.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  29.444

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 73 (73-90)²⁄ 73² 0.054
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18² 0.444
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)²⁄ 50² 0.160
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  0.883

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 73 (73-90)²⁄ 73 3.959
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 18 (18-30)²⁄ 18 8.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)²⁄ 50 8.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  24.222


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 29.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.883 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 24.222 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 29.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.883 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 24.222 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

67b4_3806

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 99 (99-90)²⁄ 99 0.818
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23 2.130
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31 0.032
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 7 1.286
(sum) χ² =  4.267

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 99 (99-90)²⁄ 99² 0.008
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 31² 0.001
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄  0.184
(sum) χ² =  0.286

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 99 (99-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 31 (31-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  3.467


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.286 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.286 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

86e4_8bd0

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  4.667

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84 0.429
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40 2.500
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 7 1.286
(sum) χ² =  4.249

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84² 0.005
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40² 0.062
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29² 0.001
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄  0.184
(sum) χ² =  0.252


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 4.249 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.252 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 4.249 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.252 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

fce0_2a9c

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 90 0.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 30 2.700
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 30 4.800
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  12.000

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)⁄ 90 -0.100
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)⁄ 30 -0.300
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)⁄ 30 0.400
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)⁄ 10 0.600
(sum) χ² =  0.600

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 81 (81-90)²⁄ 81 1.000
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 21 (21-30)²⁄ 21 3.857
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 42 (42-30)²⁄ 42 3.429
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16 2.250
(sum) χ² =  10.536


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.000 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.536 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.000 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.536 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

34e8_9bb4

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 95 (95-90)²⁄ 95 0.263
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 30 (30-30)²⁄ 30 0.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 6 2.667
(sum) χ² =  2.964

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 95 (95-90)²⁄ 90 0.278
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 30 (30-30)²⁄ 30 0.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  1.911

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 95 (95-90)²⁄ 95² 0.003
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29² 0.001
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 30 (30-30)²⁄ 30² 0.000
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄  0.444
(sum) χ² =  0.448


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.964 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.448 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.964 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.448 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

c6d4_0662

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 69 (69-90)²⁄ 69² 0.093
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 52 (52-30)²⁄ 52² 0.179
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  0.746

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 69 (69-90)²⁄ 90 4.900
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 52 (52-30)²⁄ 30 16.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  32.467

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 69 (69-90)²⁄ 69 6.391
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 52 (52-30)²⁄ 52 9.308
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  24.962


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.746 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 32.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 24.962 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.746 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 32.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 24.962 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

0956_d5b8

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)⁄ 90 -0.089
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)⁄ 30 0.467
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  0.444

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 90 0.711
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  12.178

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 82 (82-90)²⁄ 82² 0.010
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44² 0.101
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14² 0.082
(sum) χ² =  0.442


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 12.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.442 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 12.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.442 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

f07b_15e1

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 102 (102-90)²⁄ 90 1.600
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 30 0.300
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  3.933

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 102 (102-90)⁄ 90 0.133
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)⁄ 30 -0.233
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)⁄ 30 -0.100
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)⁄ 10 -0.200
(sum) χ² =  -0.400

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 102 (102-90)²⁄ 102² 0.014
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 27 (27-30)²⁄ 27² 0.012
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄  0.062
(sum) χ² =  0.181


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.181 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.181 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

d878_d8c7

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 90 1.878
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 30 4.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)²⁄ 30 13.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  20.844

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)²⁄ 77² 0.029
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)²⁄ 19² 0.335
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)²⁄ 50² 0.160
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)²⁄ 14² 0.082
(sum) χ² =  0.605

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 77 (77-90)⁄ 90 -0.144
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 19 (19-30)⁄ 30 -0.367
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 50 (50-30)⁄ 30 0.667
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 14 (14-10)⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  0.556


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.605 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.556 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.605 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.556 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

4968_b80e

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  12.267

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84² 0.005
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 38² 0.044
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.497

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)⁄ 90 -0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)⁄ 30 0.267
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.667


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.497 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.497 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

745e_3a10

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 94 0.170
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 32 (32-30)²⁄ 32 0.125
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 5 (5-10)²⁄ 5 5.000
(sum) χ² =  5.330

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 32 (32-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 5 (5-10)²⁄ 10 2.500
(sum) χ² =  2.844

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)⁄ 90 0.044
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 32 (32-30)⁄ 30 0.067
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 5 (5-10)⁄ 10 -0.500
(sum) χ² =  -0.422


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 5.330 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.422 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 5.330 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.422 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

4a16_fd55

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 90 0.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 36 (36-30)²⁄ 30 1.200
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  3.911

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 94² 0.002
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 36 (36-30)²⁄ 36² 0.028
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22² 0.132
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄  0.062
(sum) χ² =  0.224

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 94 (94-90)²⁄ 94 0.170
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 36 (36-30)²⁄ 36 1.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 22 (22-30)²⁄ 22 2.909
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 8 (8-10)²⁄ 8 0.500
(sum) χ² =  4.579


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.224 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.579 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.224 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.579 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

d231_70d8

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)⁄ 90 0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)⁄ 30 -0.067
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)⁄ 10 -0.300
(sum) χ² =  -0.333

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 96 0.375
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28 0.143
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 7 1.286
(sum) χ² =  1.838

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 96 (96-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 7 (7-10)²⁄ 10 0.900
(sum) χ² =  1.467


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.838 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.838 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

c6d2_330d

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)⁄ 90 0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)⁄ 30 -0.067
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 23 (23-30)⁄ 30 -0.233
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)⁄ 10 0.200
(sum) χ² =  -0.022

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 97² 0.005
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 28² 0.005
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 12² 0.028
(sum) χ² =  0.131

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 97 (97-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 28 (28-30)²⁄ 30 0.133
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 12 (12-10)²⁄ 10 0.400
(sum) χ² =  2.711


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.022 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.131 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.022 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.131 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC

e674_9016

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 90 2.178
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 30 0.833
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 10 8.100
(sum) χ² =  14.444

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76 2.579
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25 1.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40 2.500
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19 4.263
(sum) χ² =  10.342

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 76 (76-90)²⁄ 76² 0.034
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 25 (25-30)²⁄ 25² 0.040
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 40 (40-30)²⁄ 40² 0.062
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 19 (19-10)²⁄ 19² 0.224
(sum) χ² =  0.361


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 14.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 10.342 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 14.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 10.342 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

a9c2_07ff

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 36 (36-30)²⁄ 30 1.200
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  9.778

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)⁄ 90 -0.078
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)⁄ 30 -0.233
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 36 (36-30)⁄ 30 0.200
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.689

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83² 0.007
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23² 0.093
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 36 (36-30)²⁄ 36² 0.028
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18² 0.198
(sum) χ² =  0.325


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

4cd5_d8d0

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 66 (66-90)²⁄ 66 8.727
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26 0.615
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 52 (52-30)²⁄ 52 9.308
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16 2.250
(sum) χ² =  20.900

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 66 (66-90)²⁄ 66² 0.132
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 26² 0.024
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 52 (52-30)²⁄ 52² 0.179
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16² 0.141
(sum) χ² =  0.476

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 66 (66-90)²⁄ 90 6.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 26 (26-30)²⁄ 30 0.533
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 52 (52-30)²⁄ 30 16.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  26.667


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.900 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.476 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 26.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.900 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.476 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 26.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

cec7_8959

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 90 0.544
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 17 (17-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 30 5.633
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 10 4.900
(sum) χ² =  16.711

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83² 0.007
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 17 (17-30)²⁄ 17² 0.585
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43² 0.091
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17² 0.170
(sum) χ² =  0.853

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 83 (83-90)²⁄ 83 0.590
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 17 (17-30)²⁄ 17 9.941
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 43 (43-30)²⁄ 43 3.930
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 17 (17-10)²⁄ 17 2.882
(sum) χ² =  17.344


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.853 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 17.344 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.853 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 17.344 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

6b09_0c83

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80² 0.016
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20² 0.250
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44² 0.101
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16² 0.141
(sum) χ² =  0.507

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 80 1.250
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 44 4.455
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 16 2.250
(sum) χ² =  12.955

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 80 (80-90)²⁄ 90 1.111
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 44 (44-30)²⁄ 30 6.533
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 16 (16-10)²⁄ 10 3.600
(sum) χ² =  14.578


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.507 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 12.955 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 14.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.507 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 12.955 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 14.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

f0f9_aa58

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 102 (102-90)²⁄ 102 1.412
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 23 2.130
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 29 0.034
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 6 2.667
(sum) χ² =  6.243

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 102 (102-90)²⁄ 90 1.600
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)²⁄ 30 1.633
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)²⁄ 30 0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)²⁄ 10 1.600
(sum) χ² =  4.867

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 102 (102-90)⁄ 90 0.133
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 23 (23-30)⁄ 30 -0.233
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 29 (29-30)⁄ 30 -0.033
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 6 (6-10)⁄ 10 -0.400
(sum) χ² =  -0.533


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.243 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 4.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.243 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 4.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC

b14e_ba7d

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom Probability
0.950.900.750.500.250.100.050.01
10.000.020.100.451.322.713.846.63
20.100.210.581.392.774.615.999.21
30.350.581.212.374.116.257.8111.34
40.711.061.923.365.397.789.4913.28

Table 1
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 90 0.400
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 30 3.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 30 2.133
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 10 6.400
(sum) χ² =  12.267

Table 2
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)⁄ 90 -0.067
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)⁄ 30 -0.333
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)⁄ 30 0.267
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)⁄ 10 0.800
(sum) χ² =  0.667

Table 3
Phenotype Expected Observed Calculation Statistic
 Yellow Round (Y–R–) 90 84 (84-90)²⁄ 84 0.429
 Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) 30 20 (20-30)²⁄ 20 5.000
 Green Round (yyR–) 30 38 (38-30)²⁄ 38 1.684
 Green Wrinkled (yyrr) 10 18 (18-10)²⁄ 18 3.556
(sum) χ² =  10.668


Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.

You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.

Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.668 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.668 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect