MC
1e4a_fc79
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 81 | 1.000 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18 | 8.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 46 | (46-30)²⁄ 46 | 5.565 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 15 | 1.667 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.232 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 46 | (46-30)²⁄ 30 | 8.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 10 | 2.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.733 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)⁄ 90 | -0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)⁄ 30 | -0.400 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 46 | (46-30)⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)⁄ 10 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.533 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.232 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.232 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC6574_6658
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84² | 0.005 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31² | 0.001 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)²⁄ 39² | 0.053 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 6² | 0.444 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.504 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84 | 0.429 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31 | 0.032 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)²⁄ 39 | 2.077 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 6 | 2.667 |
(sum) χ² = | 5.204 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.733 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.504 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 5.204 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.504 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 5.204 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MCa9cb_5983
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)⁄ 90 | -0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 37 | (37-30)⁄ 30 | 0.233 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)⁄ 30 | -0.067 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.289 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 37 | (37-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.711 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83 | 0.590 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 37 | (37-30)²⁄ 37 | 1.324 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28 | 0.143 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.391 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.391 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.391 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC3a0f_9cb3
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80² | 0.016 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18² | 0.444 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44² | 0.101 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.759 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80 | 1.250 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18 | 8.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44 | 4.455 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 17.260 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 18.844 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.759 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.260 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 18.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.759 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.260 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 18.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC52d2_5dd7
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 82² | 0.010 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40² | 0.062 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.520 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)⁄ 90 | -0.089 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)⁄ 30 | 0.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.711 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.711 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 13.778 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.520 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 13.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.520 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 13.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCb315_e3d4
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.978 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83² | 0.007 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)²⁄ 39² | 0.053 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.508 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)⁄ 90 | -0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.689 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.508 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.508 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC3d5b_162d
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.867 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93² | 0.001 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34² | 0.014 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25² | 0.040 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8² | 0.062 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.117 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93 | 0.097 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34 | 0.471 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25 | 1.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.067 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.117 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.117 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC0f1c_a2f6
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.344 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 17 | (17-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 30 | 9.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 21.511 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79 | 1.532 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 17 | (17-30)²⁄ 17 | 9.941 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 47 | 6.149 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 20.504 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79² | 0.019 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 17 | (17-30)²⁄ 17² | 0.585 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 47² | 0.131 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17² | 0.170 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.905 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 20.504 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.905 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 20.504 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.905 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC1466_af7f
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.711 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.778 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)⁄ 90 | -0.089 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)⁄ 30 | -0.267 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)⁄ 30 | 0.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)⁄ 10 | 0.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.578 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 82 | 0.780 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40 | 2.500 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16 | 2.250 |
(sum) χ² = | 8.440 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 8.440 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 8.440 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC8fc5_92db
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 73 | (73-90)²⁄ 73 | 3.959 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27 | 0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42 | 3.429 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 11.276 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 73 | (73-90)⁄ 90 | -0.189 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)⁄ 30 | -0.100 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)⁄ 30 | 0.400 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.911 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 73 | (73-90)²⁄ 90 | 3.211 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 14.711 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.276 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 14.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.276 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 14.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCba15_d63c
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83² | 0.007 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 41² | 0.072 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13² | 0.053 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.225 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)⁄ 90 | -0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)⁄ 30 | -0.233 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)⁄ 30 | 0.367 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)⁄ 10 | 0.300 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.356 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 7.111 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.225 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.356 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 7.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.225 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.356 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 7.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC4422_afcd
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)⁄ 90 | 0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)⁄ 30 | -0.100 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)⁄ 30 | -0.267 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.111 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 97² | 0.005 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14² | 0.082 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.231 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.578 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.231 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.231 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC063a_1aa3
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 6.511 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 94² | 0.002 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29² | 0.001 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21² | 0.184 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16² | 0.141 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.327 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)⁄ 90 | 0.044 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)⁄ 30 | -0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)⁄ 10 | 0.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.311 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.327 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.327 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCeb79_a057
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.711 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 5.978 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 82 | 0.780 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 41 | 2.951 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25 | 1.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 5.065 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)⁄ 90 | -0.089 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)⁄ 30 | 0.367 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)⁄ 30 | -0.167 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.311 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 5.978 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 5.065 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 5.978 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 5.065 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCdaa0_e581
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)⁄ 90 | -0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.289 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.511 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83² | 0.007 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34² | 0.014 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31² | 0.001 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12² | 0.028 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.050 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.050 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.289 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.050 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCb8c4_9763
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 77² | 0.029 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21² | 0.184 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43² | 0.091 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.528 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.878 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 18.311 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 77 | 2.195 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21 | 3.857 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43 | 3.930 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 14.245 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.528 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 18.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 14.245 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.528 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 18.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 14.245 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC0fc4_e2c4
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 46 | (46-30)²⁄ 30 | 8.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 18.044 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)⁄ 90 | -0.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)⁄ 30 | -0.400 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 46 | (46-30)⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)⁄ 10 | 0.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.622 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80 | 1.250 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18 | 8.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 46 | (46-30)²⁄ 46 | 5.565 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16 | 2.250 |
(sum) χ² = | 17.065 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 18.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 17.065 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 18.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 17.065 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC57c4_4ecb
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93 | 0.097 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 38 | 1.684 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7 | 1.286 |
(sum) χ² = | 5.976 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 5.267 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93² | 0.001 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 38² | 0.044 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7² | 0.184 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.361 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 5.976 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 5.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 5.976 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 5.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC1532_ef9f
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 78 | (78-90)²⁄ 78² | 0.024 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44² | 0.101 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.572 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 78 | (78-90)²⁄ 78 | 1.846 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44 | 4.455 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 14.856 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 78 | (78-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.600 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 17.867 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.572 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 14.856 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 17.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.572 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 14.856 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 17.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC010b_95ce
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.878 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.200 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 6.178 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)⁄ 90 | -0.144 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)⁄ 30 | 0.200 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)⁄ 10 | -0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.156 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 77 | 2.195 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 39 | (39-30)²⁄ 39 | 2.077 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)²⁄ 36 | 1.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 5.772 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 5.772 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 5.772 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCf641_7618
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 13.511 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)⁄ 90 | -0.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)⁄ 30 | -0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)⁄ 30 | 0.400 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)⁄ 10 | 0.700 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.689 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80² | 0.016 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21² | 0.184 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42² | 0.082 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17² | 0.170 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.450 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 13.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.450 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 13.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.450 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC96aa_952f
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.878 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 6.844 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)⁄ 90 | -0.144 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)⁄ 30 | 0.367 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)⁄ 10 | -0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.156 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 77 | 2.195 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34 | 0.471 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 41 | 2.951 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 6.117 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 6.117 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.156 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 6.117 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC2760_969e
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 86 | 0.186 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21 | 3.857 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 35 | 0.714 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 8.313 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 10.111 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 86² | 0.002 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21² | 0.184 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 35² | 0.020 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.404 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 8.313 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 10.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.404 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 8.313 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 10.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.404 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC0554_ab72
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.844 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 30 | 7.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 53 | (53-30)²⁄ 30 | 17.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 34.378 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 74 | 3.459 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 15 | 15.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 53 | (53-30)²⁄ 53 | 9.981 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 31.996 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 74² | 0.047 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 15² | 1.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 53 | (53-30)²⁄ 53² | 0.188 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.433 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 34.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 31.996 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.433 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 34.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 31.996 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.433 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC5335_aea9
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 30 | 7.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.000 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)⁄ 90 | -0.033 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)⁄ 30 | -0.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)⁄ 30 | 0.400 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)⁄ 10 | 0.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.467 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 87² | 0.001 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 15² | 1.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42² | 0.082 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16² | 0.141 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.223 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.000 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.223 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.000 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.223 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC4bc6_f1a9
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 68 | (68-90)²⁄ 68 | 7.118 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23 | 2.130 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)²⁄ 50 | 8.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 21.511 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 68 | (68-90)⁄ 90 | -0.244 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)⁄ 30 | -0.233 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)⁄ 30 | 0.667 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.089 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 68 | (68-90)²⁄ 90 | 5.378 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)²⁄ 30 | 13.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 28.444 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.089 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 28.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 21.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.089 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 28.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCf725_653b
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.344 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 45 | (45-30)²⁄ 30 | 7.500 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 11.378 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79² | 0.019 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 45 | (45-30)²⁄ 45² | 0.111 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13² | 0.053 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.276 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79 | 1.532 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23 | 2.130 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 45 | (45-30)²⁄ 45 | 5.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13 | 0.692 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.354 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.276 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 9.354 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.276 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 9.354 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC1618_0296
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)⁄ 90 | -0.122 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)⁄ 30 | -0.367 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)⁄ 30 | 0.567 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)⁄ 10 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.578 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.344 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 30 | 9.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 10 | 2.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 17.511 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79 | 1.532 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 19 | 6.368 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 47 | 6.149 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 15 | 1.667 |
(sum) χ² = | 15.716 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 15.716 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 15.716 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC57af_61a9
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)⁄ 90 | -0.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)⁄ 30 | -0.400 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)⁄ 30 | 0.433 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.822 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80 | 1.250 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18 | 8.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43 | 3.930 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 17.443 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 19.644 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.822 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.443 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 19.644 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.822 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.443 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 19.644 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC15ab_3923
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)⁄ 90 | -0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)⁄ 30 | -0.267 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)⁄ 30 | 0.267 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)⁄ 10 | 0.700 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.622 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.711 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83 | 0.590 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 38 | 1.684 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 8.066 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 9.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 8.066 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.622 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 9.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 8.066 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC5235_6414
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93² | 0.001 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)²⁄ 33² | 0.008 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12² | 0.028 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.169 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.933 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93 | 0.097 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)²⁄ 33 | 0.273 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.612 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.169 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.612 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.169 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.612 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC3f25_86d4
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 98 | (98-90)²⁄ 98 | 0.653 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28 | 0.143 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26 | 0.615 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.911 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 98 | (98-90)²⁄ 98² | 0.007 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28² | 0.005 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26² | 0.024 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8² | 0.062 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.098 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 98 | (98-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.711 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.778 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.098 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.098 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC7a55_56ae
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)⁄ 90 | -0.089 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)⁄ 30 | -0.367 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)⁄ 30 | 0.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.778 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.711 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.178 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 82 | 0.780 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 19 | 6.368 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40 | 2.500 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 13.912 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 13.912 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 13.912 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC43a2_68ff
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.333 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96 | 0.375 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26 | 0.615 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.490 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)⁄ 90 | 0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)⁄ 30 | 0.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)⁄ 30 | -0.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)⁄ 10 | -0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.267 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.490 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.490 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC5b74_814a
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 10 | 2.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 11.733 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)⁄ 90 | -0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)⁄ 30 | -0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)⁄ 30 | 0.433 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)⁄ 10 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.533 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 81² | 0.012 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21² | 0.184 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43² | 0.091 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 15² | 0.111 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.399 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.399 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.399 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCa2f0_acb0
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.200 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.133 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96 | 0.375 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 24 | 1.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28 | 0.143 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.351 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)⁄ 90 | 0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)⁄ 30 | -0.200 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)⁄ 30 | -0.067 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.000 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.133 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.351 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.000 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.133 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.351 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.000 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC3abe_e3e4
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83 | 0.590 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)²⁄ 33 | 0.273 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 15 | 1.667 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.564 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)⁄ 90 | -0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)⁄ 30 | 0.100 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)⁄ 10 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.489 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 10 | 2.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.378 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.564 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.564 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC2231_ad74
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 85 | (85-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.278 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 11.044 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 85 | (85-90)²⁄ 85² | 0.003 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34² | 0.014 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.374 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 85 | (85-90)²⁄ 85 | 0.294 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34 | 0.471 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 7.937 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.374 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 7.937 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.374 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 7.937 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC431d_a5bf
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 95 | (95-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.278 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.511 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 95 | (95-90)²⁄ 95 | 0.263 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27 | 0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26 | 0.615 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.545 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 95 | (95-90)²⁄ 95² | 0.003 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26² | 0.024 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12² | 0.028 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.067 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.545 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.545 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC9c35_4ac9
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 87² | 0.001 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 24² | 0.062 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 35² | 0.020 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14² | 0.082 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.166 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.200 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.733 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)⁄ 90 | -0.033 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)⁄ 30 | -0.200 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)⁄ 30 | 0.167 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.333 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.166 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.166 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC6483_b191
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 86 | 0.186 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34 | 0.471 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 7.121 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.244 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 86² | 0.002 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 34 | (34-30)²⁄ 34² | 0.014 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.346 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 7.121 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.346 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 7.121 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.346 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCd238_39cb
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 97 | 0.505 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23 | 2.130 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27 | 0.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13 | 0.692 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.661 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.378 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 97² | 0.005 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13² | 0.053 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.163 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.661 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.163 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.661 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.378 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.163 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCdd07_254b
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 81² | 0.012 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29² | 0.001 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 35² | 0.020 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 15² | 0.111 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.145 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)⁄ 90 | -0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)⁄ 30 | 0.167 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)⁄ 10 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.533 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 15 | (15-10)²⁄ 10 | 2.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.267 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.145 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.145 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MCd413_d84f
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79² | 0.019 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40² | 0.062 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.438 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.344 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 14.911 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)⁄ 90 | -0.122 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)⁄ 30 | -0.267 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)⁄ 30 | 0.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.844 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.438 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 14.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.438 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 14.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC02eb_49b1
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96² | 0.004 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29² | 0.001 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8² | 0.062 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.080 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)⁄ 90 | 0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)⁄ 30 | -0.100 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)⁄ 10 | -0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.267 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.133 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.080 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.133 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.080 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.133 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC7407_fbe1
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96² | 0.004 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26² | 0.024 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 24² | 0.062 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14² | 0.082 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.172 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.200 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.733 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96 | 0.375 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26 | 0.615 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 24 | 1.500 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14 | 1.143 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.633 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.172 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.633 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.172 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.733 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.633 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC0bf5_ea6f
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 74 | 3.459 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 19 | 6.368 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 49 | (49-30)²⁄ 49 | 7.367 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 20.751 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.844 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 49 | (49-30)²⁄ 30 | 12.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 25.311 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 74² | 0.047 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 19² | 0.335 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 49 | (49-30)²⁄ 49² | 0.150 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.730 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.751 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 25.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.730 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.751 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 25.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.730 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCb988_88c7
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 13 | (13-30)²⁄ 30 | 9.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 30 | 9.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 28.267 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)⁄ 90 | -0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 13 | (13-30)⁄ 30 | -0.567 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)⁄ 30 | 0.567 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.800 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 81² | 0.012 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 13 | (13-30)²⁄ 13² | 1.710 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 47² | 0.131 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.078 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 28.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.800 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.078 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 28.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.800 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.078 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC0bba_edcb
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 87 | 0.103 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 15 | 15.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 41 | 2.951 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 20.937 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 30 | 7.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.533 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)⁄ 90 | -0.033 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)⁄ 30 | -0.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 41 | (41-30)⁄ 30 | 0.367 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)⁄ 10 | 0.700 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.533 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.937 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.937 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC0e1b_9dcc
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96 | 0.375 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28 | 0.143 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23 | 2.130 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13 | 0.692 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.341 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96² | 0.004 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28² | 0.005 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13² | 0.053 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.155 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.067 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.341 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.155 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.341 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.155 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC9674_ddab
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 101 | (101-90)²⁄ 101² | 0.012 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 24² | 0.062 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28² | 0.005 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7² | 0.184 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.263 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 101 | (101-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.344 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.200 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.578 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 101 | (101-90)⁄ 90 | 0.122 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 24 | (24-30)⁄ 30 | -0.200 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)⁄ 30 | -0.067 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)⁄ 10 | -0.300 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.444 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.263 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.263 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCf1a5_c777
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 45 | (45-30)²⁄ 30 | 7.500 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.711 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76 | 2.579 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 45 | (45-30)²⁄ 45 | 5.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 13.370 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76² | 0.034 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 45 | (45-30)²⁄ 45² | 0.111 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17² | 0.170 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.447 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 13.370 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.447 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 13.370 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.447 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC4235_8762
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96² | 0.004 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25² | 0.040 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31² | 0.001 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8² | 0.062 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.107 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)⁄ 90 | 0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)⁄ 30 | -0.167 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)⁄ 10 | -0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.267 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.667 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.107 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.107 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC07fb_19e2
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)⁄ 90 | 0.044 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)⁄ 30 | -0.067 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)⁄ 10 | -0.300 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.289 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.244 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 94 | 0.170 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28 | 0.143 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31 | 0.032 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7 | 1.286 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.631 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.289 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.244 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.631 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.289 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.244 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.631 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCd528_3e9f
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79² | 0.019 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 47² | 0.131 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14² | 0.082 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.482 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)⁄ 90 | -0.122 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)⁄ 30 | 0.567 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.511 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.344 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 30 | 9.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 15.911 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.482 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 15.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.482 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.511 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 15.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC1a7f_80b2
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76 | 2.579 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25 | 1.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 47 | 6.149 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 10.061 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)²⁄ 30 | 9.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 13.044 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)⁄ 90 | -0.156 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)⁄ 30 | -0.167 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 47 | (47-30)⁄ 30 | 0.567 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.444 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 10.061 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 13.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 10.061 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 13.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC6f2c_939e
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 74 | 3.459 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23 | 2.130 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44 | 4.455 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 14.308 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.844 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 19.111 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 74 | (74-90)⁄ 90 | -0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)⁄ 30 | -0.233 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)⁄ 30 | 0.467 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.956 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 14.308 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 19.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.956 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 14.308 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 19.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.956 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC96b5_2a48
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.778 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 97 | 0.505 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27 | 0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7 | 1.286 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.159 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 97² | 0.005 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29² | 0.001 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7² | 0.184 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.202 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.159 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.202 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.159 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.202 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCdb5a_84ef
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 75 | (75-90)²⁄ 75² | 0.040 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 49 | (49-30)²⁄ 49² | 0.150 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16² | 0.141 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.581 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 75 | (75-90)²⁄ 75 | 3.000 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 49 | (49-30)²⁄ 49 | 7.367 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16 | 2.250 |
(sum) χ² = | 17.617 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 75 | (75-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.500 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 49 | (49-30)²⁄ 30 | 12.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 21.467 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.581 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 17.617 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 21.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.581 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 17.617 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 21.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC1d61_8db6
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)⁄ 90 | -0.033 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 12 | (12-30)⁄ 30 | -0.600 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)⁄ 30 | 0.433 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.600 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 87² | 0.001 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 12 | (12-30)²⁄ 12² | 2.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43² | 0.091 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.540 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 12 | (12-30)²⁄ 30 | 10.800 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 22.933 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.540 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 22.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.540 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 22.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCc002_d0b2
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)⁄ 90 | 0.033 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)⁄ 30 | -0.167 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)⁄ 30 | 0.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.067 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.333 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93² | 0.001 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25² | 0.040 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)²⁄ 30² | 0.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12² | 0.028 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.069 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.069 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.069 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC8712_67c3
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)⁄ 90 | 0.033 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)⁄ 30 | -0.067 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)⁄ 30 | 0.167 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 4 | (4-10)⁄ 10 | -0.600 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.467 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 93 | 0.097 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28 | 0.143 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 35 | 0.714 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 4 | (4-10)²⁄ 4 | 9.000 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.954 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 93 | (93-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 35 | (35-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 4 | (4-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.667 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 9.954 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 9.954 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC04f1_ca4a
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 67 | (67-90)⁄ 90 | -0.256 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 55 | (55-30)⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.044 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 67 | (67-90)²⁄ 67 | 7.896 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 55 | (55-30)²⁄ 55 | 11.364 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 27.815 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 67 | (67-90)²⁄ 90 | 5.878 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 55 | (55-30)²⁄ 30 | 20.833 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 36.444 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 27.815 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 36.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 27.815 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 36.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCafa7_47b5
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 81² | 0.012 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40² | 0.062 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12² | 0.028 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.115 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 81 | 1.000 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40 | 2.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27 | 0.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.167 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.933 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.115 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 4.167 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.115 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 4.167 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC4ca0_2449
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)⁄ 90 | -0.122 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)⁄ 30 | 0.467 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)⁄ 10 | 0.700 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.711 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 79 | 1.532 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44 | 4.455 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 13.869 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 79 | (79-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.344 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.111 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 13.869 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 16.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 13.869 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 16.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCa8bb_bc42
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76² | 0.034 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25² | 0.040 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42² | 0.082 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17² | 0.170 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.325 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.711 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76 | 2.579 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25 | 1.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42 | 3.429 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.890 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 12.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 9.890 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 12.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 9.890 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC5ec9_fae3
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.978 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)⁄ 90 | -0.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)⁄ 30 | -0.267 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)⁄ 30 | 0.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.756 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80 | 1.250 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40 | 2.500 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 10.215 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.756 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.215 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.978 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.756 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.215 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC41db_acfb
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84 | 0.429 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 14 | (14-30)²⁄ 14 | 18.286 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44 | 4.455 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 26.724 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)⁄ 90 | -0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 14 | (14-30)⁄ 30 | -0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)⁄ 30 | 0.467 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.667 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 14 | (14-30)²⁄ 30 | 8.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 21.867 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 26.724 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 21.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 26.724 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 21.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC1efb_ccf8
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 86 | 0.186 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 38 | 1.684 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16 | 2.250 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.120 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)⁄ 90 | -0.044 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)⁄ 30 | 0.267 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)⁄ 10 | 0.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.489 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.244 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 9.120 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 9.120 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.489 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 9.244 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC737d_fd5a
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)⁄ 90 | -0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)⁄ 30 | -0.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)⁄ 30 | 0.467 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)⁄ 10 | 0.700 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.600 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84 | 0.429 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 15 | 15.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44 | 4.455 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 22.765 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 15 | (15-30)²⁄ 30 | 7.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 19.333 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 22.765 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 19.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 22.765 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 19.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC5645_1286
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 94 | 0.170 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 32 | (32-30)²⁄ 32 | 0.125 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.538 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)⁄ 90 | 0.044 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 32 | (32-30)⁄ 30 | 0.067 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)⁄ 30 | -0.267 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.044 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 32 | (32-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.844 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.538 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.044 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.538 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.044 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC1e32_86a3
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 86 | 0.186 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31 | 0.032 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31 | 0.032 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12 | 0.333 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.584 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.644 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 86 | (86-90)²⁄ 86² | 0.002 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31² | 0.001 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31² | 0.001 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12² | 0.028 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.032 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.584 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.644 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.032 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.584 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.644 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.032 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCaa52_4306
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)⁄ 90 | -0.033 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)⁄ 30 | -0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)⁄ 30 | 0.100 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.333 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 87 | 0.103 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26 | 0.615 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)²⁄ 33 | 0.273 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14 | 1.143 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.134 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 87 | (87-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 33 | (33-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.533 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.134 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.134 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC2538_b6a0
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76² | 0.034 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18² | 0.444 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 48 | (48-30)²⁄ 48² | 0.141 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.817 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76 | 2.579 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18 | 8.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 48 | (48-30)²⁄ 48 | 6.750 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 20.885 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 48 | (48-30)²⁄ 30 | 10.800 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 24.178 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.817 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 20.885 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 24.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.817 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 20.885 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 24.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC26c9_f0f8
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 72 | (72-90)²⁄ 72 | 4.500 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27 | 0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42 | 3.429 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.525 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 72 | (72-90)²⁄ 90 | 3.600 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.800 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 72 | (72-90)²⁄ 72² | 0.062 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42² | 0.082 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.381 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.525 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 16.800 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.381 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.525 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 16.800 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.381 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC4871_3654
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 85 | (85-90)²⁄ 85 | 0.294 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 19 | 6.368 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43 | 3.930 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 13 | 0.692 |
(sum) χ² = | 11.285 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 85 | (85-90)⁄ 90 | -0.056 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)⁄ 30 | -0.367 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)⁄ 30 | 0.433 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)⁄ 10 | 0.300 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.311 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 85 | (85-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.278 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 13 | (13-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 10.844 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 11.285 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 11.285 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.311 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCe7dc_3061
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.067 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)⁄ 90 | 0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)⁄ 10 | -0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.400 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96 | 0.375 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 6 | 2.667 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.111 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.111 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.111 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCa580_553d
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 99 | (99-90)⁄ 90 | 0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)⁄ 30 | -0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)⁄ 10 | -0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.467 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 99 | (99-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.067 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 99 | (99-90)²⁄ 99² | 0.008 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26² | 0.024 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29² | 0.001 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 6² | 0.444 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.478 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.478 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 3.067 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.478 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC38b9_caf8
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 73 | (73-90)²⁄ 90 | 3.211 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)²⁄ 30 | 13.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 29.444 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 73 | (73-90)²⁄ 73² | 0.054 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18² | 0.444 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)²⁄ 50² | 0.160 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.883 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 73 | (73-90)²⁄ 73 | 3.959 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 18 | (18-30)²⁄ 18 | 8.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)²⁄ 50 | 8.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 24.222 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 29.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.883 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 24.222 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 29.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.883 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 24.222 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC67b4_3806
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 99 | (99-90)²⁄ 99 | 0.818 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23 | 2.130 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31 | 0.032 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7 | 1.286 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.267 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 99 | (99-90)²⁄ 99² | 0.008 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 31² | 0.001 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7² | 0.184 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.286 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 99 | (99-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 31 | (31-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.467 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.286 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 3.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 4.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.286 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 3.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MC86e4_8bd0
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.667 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84 | 0.429 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40 | 2.500 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7 | 1.286 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.249 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84² | 0.005 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40² | 0.062 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29² | 0.001 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7² | 0.184 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.252 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 4.249 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.252 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 4.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 4.249 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.252 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCfce0_2a9c
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.700 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.800 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.000 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)⁄ 90 | -0.100 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)⁄ 30 | -0.300 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)⁄ 30 | 0.400 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)⁄ 10 | 0.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.600 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 81 | (81-90)²⁄ 81 | 1.000 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 21 | (21-30)²⁄ 21 | 3.857 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 42 | (42-30)²⁄ 42 | 3.429 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16 | 2.250 |
(sum) χ² = | 10.536 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.000 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.536 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.000 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.600 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.536 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC34e8_9bb4
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 95 | (95-90)²⁄ 95 | 0.263 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 6 | 2.667 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.964 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 95 | (95-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.278 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.911 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 95 | (95-90)²⁄ 95² | 0.003 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29² | 0.001 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 30 | (30-30)²⁄ 30² | 0.000 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 6² | 0.444 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.448 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 2.964 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.448 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 2.964 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.448 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCc6d4_0662
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 69 | (69-90)²⁄ 69² | 0.093 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 52 | (52-30)²⁄ 52² | 0.179 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.746 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 69 | (69-90)²⁄ 90 | 4.900 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 52 | (52-30)²⁄ 30 | 16.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 32.467 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 69 | (69-90)²⁄ 69 | 6.391 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 52 | (52-30)²⁄ 52 | 9.308 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 24.962 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.746 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 32.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 24.962 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.746 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 32.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 24.962 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC0956_d5b8
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)⁄ 90 | -0.089 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)⁄ 30 | 0.467 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.444 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.711 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.178 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 82 | (82-90)²⁄ 82² | 0.010 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44² | 0.101 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14² | 0.082 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.442 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 12.178 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.442 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 12.178 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.442 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCf07b_15e1
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 102 | (102-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.600 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.300 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.933 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 102 | (102-90)⁄ 90 | 0.133 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)⁄ 30 | -0.233 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)⁄ 30 | -0.100 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)⁄ 10 | -0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.400 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 102 | (102-90)²⁄ 102² | 0.014 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 27 | (27-30)²⁄ 27² | 0.012 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8² | 0.062 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.181 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.933 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.181 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.933 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = -0.400 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.181 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCd878_d8c7
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.878 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 30 | 4.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)²⁄ 30 | 13.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 20.844 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)²⁄ 77² | 0.029 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)²⁄ 19² | 0.335 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)²⁄ 50² | 0.160 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)²⁄ 14² | 0.082 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.605 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 77 | (77-90)⁄ 90 | -0.144 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 19 | (19-30)⁄ 30 | -0.367 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 50 | (50-30)⁄ 30 | 0.667 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 14 | (14-10)⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.556 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.605 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.556 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.605 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.556 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC4968_b80e
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.267 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84² | 0.005 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 38² | 0.044 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.497 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)⁄ 90 | -0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)⁄ 30 | 0.267 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.667 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.497 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.497 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC745e_3a10
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 94 | 0.170 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 32 | (32-30)²⁄ 32 | 0.125 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 5 | (5-10)²⁄ 5 | 5.000 |
(sum) χ² = | 5.330 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 32 | (32-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 5 | (5-10)²⁄ 10 | 2.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.844 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)⁄ 90 | 0.044 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 32 | (32-30)⁄ 30 | 0.067 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 5 | (5-10)⁄ 10 | -0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.422 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 5.330 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.422 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 5.330 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 2.844 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.422 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC4a16_fd55
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.200 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 3.911 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 94² | 0.002 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)²⁄ 36² | 0.028 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22² | 0.132 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8² | 0.062 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.224 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 94 | (94-90)²⁄ 94 | 0.170 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)²⁄ 36 | 1.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 22 | (22-30)²⁄ 22 | 2.909 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 8 | (8-10)²⁄ 8 | 0.500 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.579 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 3.911 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.224 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 4.579 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 3.911 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.224 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 4.579 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCd231_70d8
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)⁄ 90 | 0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)⁄ 30 | -0.067 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)⁄ 10 | -0.300 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.333 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 96 | 0.375 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28 | 0.143 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 7 | 1.286 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.838 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 96 | (96-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 7 | (7-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 1.467 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.333 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.838 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 1.467 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.333 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.838 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 1.467 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MCc6d2_330d
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)⁄ 90 | 0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)⁄ 30 | -0.067 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)⁄ 30 | -0.233 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)⁄ 10 | 0.200 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.022 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 97² | 0.005 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 28² | 0.005 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 12² | 0.028 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.131 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 97 | (97-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 28 | (28-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.133 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 12 | (12-10)²⁄ 10 | 0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 2.711 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = -0.022 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.131 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = -0.022 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.131 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 2.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct MCe674_9016
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 90 | 2.178 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.833 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 10 | 8.100 |
(sum) χ² = | 14.444 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76 | 2.579 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25 | 1.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40 | 2.500 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19 | 4.263 |
(sum) χ² = | 10.342 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 76 | (76-90)²⁄ 76² | 0.034 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 25 | (25-30)²⁄ 25² | 0.040 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 40 | (40-30)²⁄ 40² | 0.062 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 19 | (19-10)²⁄ 19² | 0.224 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.361 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 14.444 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 10.342 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 14.444 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 10.342 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.361 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCa9c2_07ff
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.200 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 9.778 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)⁄ 90 | -0.078 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)⁄ 30 | -0.233 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)⁄ 30 | 0.200 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.689 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83² | 0.007 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23² | 0.093 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 36 | (36-30)²⁄ 36² | 0.028 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18² | 0.198 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.325 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 9.778 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.689 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.325 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC4cd5_d8d0
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 66 | (66-90)²⁄ 66 | 8.727 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26 | 0.615 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 52 | (52-30)²⁄ 52 | 9.308 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16 | 2.250 |
(sum) χ² = | 20.900 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 66 | (66-90)²⁄ 66² | 0.132 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 26² | 0.024 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 52 | (52-30)²⁄ 52² | 0.179 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16² | 0.141 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.476 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 66 | (66-90)²⁄ 90 | 6.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 26 | (26-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.533 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 52 | (52-30)²⁄ 30 | 16.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 26.667 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 20.900 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.476 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 26.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 20.900 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.476 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 26.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCcec7_8959
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.544 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 17 | (17-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 30 | 5.633 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 10 | 4.900 |
(sum) χ² = | 16.711 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83² | 0.007 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 17 | (17-30)²⁄ 17² | 0.585 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43² | 0.091 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17² | 0.170 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.853 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 83 | (83-90)²⁄ 83 | 0.590 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 17 | (17-30)²⁄ 17 | 9.941 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 43 | (43-30)²⁄ 43 | 3.930 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 17 | (17-10)²⁄ 17 | 2.882 |
(sum) χ² = | 17.344 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.853 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 17.344 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 16.711 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.853 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 17.344 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MC6b09_0c83
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80² | 0.016 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20² | 0.250 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44² | 0.101 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16² | 0.141 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.507 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 80 | 1.250 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 44 | 4.455 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 16 | 2.250 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.955 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 80 | (80-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.111 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 44 | (44-30)²⁄ 30 | 6.533 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 16 | (16-10)²⁄ 10 | 3.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 14.578 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 0.507 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 12.955 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 14.578 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct D. Table 1 with χ² = 0.507 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 12.955 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 14.578 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCf0f9_aa58
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 102 | (102-90)²⁄ 102 | 1.412 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 23 | 2.130 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 29 | 0.034 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 6 | 2.667 |
(sum) χ² = | 6.243 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 102 | (102-90)²⁄ 90 | 1.600 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)²⁄ 30 | 1.633 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)²⁄ 30 | 0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)²⁄ 10 | 1.600 |
(sum) χ² = | 4.867 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 102 | (102-90)⁄ 90 | 0.133 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 23 | (23-30)⁄ 30 | -0.233 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 29 | (29-30)⁄ 30 | -0.033 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 6 | (6-10)⁄ 10 | -0.400 |
(sum) χ² = | -0.533 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 6.243 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect B. Table 2 with χ² = 4.867 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = -0.533 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 6.243 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 4.867 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Correct F. Table 3 with χ² = -0.533 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect MCb14e_ba7d
Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | Probability | |||||||
0.95 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.63 |
2 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.39 | 2.77 | 4.61 | 5.99 | 9.21 |
3 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 6.25 | 7.81 | 11.34 |
4 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 5.39 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 |
Table 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 90 | 0.400 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 30 | 3.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 30 | 2.133 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 10 | 6.400 |
(sum) χ² = | 12.267 |
Table 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)⁄ 90 | -0.067 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)⁄ 30 | -0.333 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)⁄ 30 | 0.267 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)⁄ 10 | 0.800 |
(sum) χ² = | 0.667 |
Table 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype | Expected | Observed | Calculation | Statistic |
Yellow Round (Y–R–) | 90 | 84 | (84-90)²⁄ 84 | 0.429 |
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr) | 30 | 20 | (20-30)²⁄ 20 | 5.000 |
Green Round (yyR–) | 30 | 38 | (38-30)²⁄ 38 | 1.684 |
Green Wrinkled (yyrr) | 10 | 18 | (18-10)²⁄ 18 | 3.556 |
(sum) χ² = | 10.668 |
Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F2 generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can accept or reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.
A. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Correct B. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect C. Table 3 with χ² = 10.668 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis Incorrect D. Table 1 with χ² = 12.267 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect E. Table 2 with χ² = 0.667 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect F. Table 3 with χ² = 10.668 is correct and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis Incorrect