7: Chi Square Analysis

Students perform chi-square tests on genetic cross data to evaluate whether observed ratios fit expected Mendelian predictions.

LibreTexts reference: Chapter 7: Chi Square Analysis

Matching Chi-Square Terms to Definitions

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT WeBWorK PGML

Click to show Matching Chi-Square Terms to Definitions example problem

Match each of the following chi-square (χ²) terms with their corresponding definitions.
Note: Each choice will be used exactly once.

	Your Choice	Prompt
	Drop Your Choice Here	1. null hypothesis, H0
	Drop Your Choice Here	2. critical value
	Drop Your Choice Here	3. chi-square (χ²) test statistic
	Drop Your Choice Here	4. p-value
	Drop Your Choice Here	5. degrees of freedom

Drag one of the choices below:

• A. we attempt to find evidence against this hypothesis in our chi-square (χ²) test
• B. represents how many independent values can vary after constraints are applied
• C. the smaller this number, the bigger the chi-square (χ²) test statistic
• D. the boundary of how extreme a test statistic we need to support the null hypothesis, H₀
• E. a measure of the discrepancy between the observed and expected data sets

Check Answer Reset Game

 

True/False Statements About Chi-Square Tests

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT WeBWorK PGML

Click to show True/False Statements About Chi-Square Tests example problem

Which one of the following statements is TRUE concerning chi-square (χ²) tests?

• A. the null hypothesis, H₀ is REJECTED if the chi-square (χ²) statistic is larger than the critical value
• B. the alternative hypothesis, H_a is SUPPORTED if the p-value is larger than the level of significance, α
• C. the null hypothesis, H₀ is REJECTED if the p-value is less than the critical value
• D. the alternative hypothesis, H_a is NOT SUPPORTED if the chi-square (χ²) statistic is less than the level of significance, α
• E. the alternative hypothesis, H_a is SUPPORTED if the chi-square (χ²) statistic is less than the critical value

Check Answer

 

Chi-Square Terms from Definitions

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT WeBWorK PGML

Click to show Chi-Square Terms from Definitions example problem

Which one of the following chi-square (χ²) terms correspond to the definition 'the cutoff used to compare against the observed chi-square (χ²) test statistic'.

• A. alternative hypothesis, H_a
• B. critical value
• C. degrees of freedom
• D. null hypothesis, H₀
• E. p-value

Check Answer

 

Chi-Square Values for Phenotypic Ratios

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT

Click to show Chi-Square Values for Phenotypic Ratios example problem

Data Table
Phenotype	Expected	Observed	Calculation	Statistic
Yellow Round (Y–R–)	90	95	__	__
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr)	30	25	__	__
Green Round (yyR–)	30	28	__	__
Green Wrinkled (yyrr)	10	12	__	__
(sum) χ2 =				__

---

Complete the table and calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value.
Even though not part of the question, ask yourself whether you would reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis
Note: answers need to be within 2% of the correct number to be correct.

Check Answer

 

Hypothesis Decisions from Chi-Square Tests

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT

Click to show Hypothesis Decisions from Chi-Square Tests example problem

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom	Probability
	0.95	0.90	0.75	0.50	0.25	0.10	0.05	0.01
1	0.00	0.02	0.10	0.45	1.32	2.71	3.84	6.63
2	0.10	0.21	0.58	1.39	2.77	4.61	5.99	9.21
3	0.35	0.58	1.21	2.37	4.11	6.25	7.81	11.34
4	0.71	1.06	1.92	3.36	5.39	7.78	9.49	13.28

Table 1
Phenotype	Expected	Observed	Calculation	Statistic
Yellow Round (Y–R–)	90	95	(95-90)²⁄ 90	0.278
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr)	30	31	(31-30)²⁄ 30	0.033
Green Round (yyR–)	30	27	(27-30)²⁄ 30	0.300
Green Wrinkled (yyrr)	10	7	(7-10)²⁄ 10	0.900
(sum) χ² =				1.511

Table 2
Phenotype	Expected	Observed	Calculation	Statistic
Yellow Round (Y–R–)	90	95	(95-90)²⁄ 95	0.263
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr)	30	31	(31-30)²⁄ 31	0.032
Green Round (yyR–)	30	27	(27-30)²⁄ 27	0.333
Green Wrinkled (yyrr)	10	7	(7-10)²⁄ 7	1.286
(sum) χ² =				1.914

Table 3
Phenotype	Expected	Observed	Calculation	Statistic
Yellow Round (Y–R–)	90	95	(95-90)²⁄ 95²	0.003
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr)	30	31	(31-30)²⁄ 31²	0.001
Green Round (yyR–)	30	27	(27-30)²⁄ 27²	0.012
Green Wrinkled (yyrr)	10	7	(7-10)²⁄ 7²	0.184
(sum) χ² =				0.200

---

Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll) and did another a chi-squared (χ²) test on the F₂ generation in a dihybid cross based on your lab data (above). They wanted to know if the results confirm the expected phenotype ratios.
You helped them set up the null hypothesis, so you know that part is correct, but they got confused and were unsure about how to calculate the chi-squared (χ²) value. So much so that they did it three (3) different ways.
Before you ask your instructor for a new lab partner, tell them which table is correct AND whether they can reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis using the information provided.

• A. Table 1 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis
• B. Table 2 with χ² = 1.914 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis
• C. Table 3 with χ² = 0.200 is correct and we REJECT the null hypothesis
• D. Table 1 with χ² = 1.511 is correct and we FAIL to REJECT the null hypothesis
• E. Table 2 with χ² = 1.914 is correct and we FAIL to REJECT the null hypothesis
• F. Table 3 with χ² = 0.200 is correct and we FAIL to REJECT the null hypothesis

Check Answer

 

Errors in Chi-Square Calculations and Hypothesis Decisions

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT

Click to show Errors in Chi-Square Calculations and Hypothesis Decisions example problem

Table of Chi-Squared (χ²) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom	Probability
	0.95	0.90	0.75	0.50	0.25	0.10	0.05	0.01
1	0.00	0.02	0.10	0.45	1.32	2.71	3.84	6.63
2	0.10	0.21	0.58	1.39	2.77	4.61	5.99	9.21
3	0.35	0.58	1.21	2.37	4.11	6.25	7.81	11.34
4	0.71	1.06	1.92	3.36	5.39	7.78	9.49	13.28

Phenotype	Expected	Observed	Calculation	Statistic
Yellow Round (Y–R–)	90	79	(79-90)²⁄ 90	1.344
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr)	30	16	(16-30)²⁄ 30	6.533
Green Round (yyR–)	30	50	(50-30)²⁄ 30	13.333
Green Wrinkled (yyrr)	10	15	(15-10)²⁄ 10	2.500
(sum) χ² =				23.711

The final result gives the chi-squared (χ²) test value of 23.71 with 2 degrees of freedom. Consulting the Table of χ² Critical Values and a level of significance α=0.05, we obtain a critical value of 5.99.
Since the chi-squared value of 23.71 is greater than the critical value of 5.99, the null hypothesis has BEEN REJECTED.

---

Your lab partner completed a chi-squared (χ²) test on your lab data (above) for the F₂ generation in a standard dihybrid cross. The goal was to verify if the observed results matched the expected phenotype ratios.
However, it appears they made an error. What did they do wrong?

• A. The wrong rejection criteria was used. the significance level, α is wrong.
• B. The expected progeny for the null hypothesis is incorrect. They did the calculation wrong.
• C. The degrees of freedom is wrong, it should be a different value.
• D. The wrong numbers in the calculation were used for division, you need to divide by a different number.
• E. The numbers in the calculation have to be squared and they are not squared.

Check Answer

 

Chi-Square Tests for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT

Click to show Chi-Square Tests for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium example problem

Table of Chi-Squared (χ2) Critical Values
Degrees of Freedom	Probability
	0.95	0.90	0.75	0.50	0.25	0.10	0.05	0.01
1	0.00	0.02	0.10	0.45	1.32	2.71	3.84	6.63
2	0.10	0.21	0.58	1.39	2.77	4.61	5.99	9.21
3	0.35	0.58	1.21	2.37	4.11	6.25	7.81	11.34
4	0.71	1.06	1.92	3.36	5.39	7.78	9.49	13.28

Table 1
Phenotype	Observed	Expected	Calculation	Statistic
Red Flowers	54	49.4	(54-49.4)2⁄ 49.4	0.428
Pink Flowers	32	41.7	(32-41.7)2⁄ 41.7	2.256
White Flowers	13	8.8	(13-8.8)2⁄ 8.8	2.005
(sum) χ2 =				4.689

---

You finally have a new competent lab partner that you trust.
This lab partner calculated the allele frequencies of p=0.70 and q=0.30. Then they did a chi-squared (χ²) test for your Hardy-Weinberg data.
They need you to decide whether you reject or accept the null hypothesis using the information provided.

• A. the chi-squared (χ²) sum is GREATER than the critical value and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis
• B. the chi-squared (χ²) sum is LESS than the critical value and we ACCEPT the null hypothesis
• C. the chi-squared (χ²) sum is GREATER than the critical value and we REJECT the null hypothesis
• D. the chi-squared (χ²) sum is LESS than the critical value and we REJECT the null hypothesis

Check Answer

 

Null and Alternative Hypotheses for Genetic Crosses

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT

Click to show Null and Alternative Hypotheses for Genetic Crosses example problem

You perform a standard dihybrid cross and count the F₂ offspring phenotypes.
Total offspring scored: 192

Observed data
Category	Ratio	Expected	Observed
Yellow Round (Y–R–)	9	108	108
Yellow Wrinkled (Y–rr)	3	36	31
Green Round (yyR–)	3	36	38
Green Wrinkled (yyrr)	1	12	15

---

For a chi-squared (χ²) goodness-of-fit test, which option correctly states the null hypothesis (H₀) and the alternative hypothesis (H_A)?

• A.

  H₀: The offspring proportions are consistent with the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio (any differences from the expected ratio are due to chance).
  H_A: The offspring proportions are not consistent with the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio (the differences are too large to explain by chance alone).

• B.

  H₀: The offspring proportions are not consistent with the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio (the differences are too large to explain by chance alone).
  H_A: The offspring proportions are consistent with the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio (any differences from the expected ratio are due to chance).

• C.

  H₀: The observed counts are exactly in a 9:3:3:1 ratio.
  H_A: The observed counts are not exactly in a 9:3:3:1 ratio.

• D.

  H₀: The offspring proportions are consistent with the expected 8:2:4:2 ratio (any differences from the expected ratio are due to chance).
  H_A: The offspring proportions are not consistent with the expected 8:2:4:2 ratio (the differences are too large to explain by chance alone).

Check Answer

 

Misstated Null Hypotheses for Genetic Ratios

BBQ Text Blackboard Ultra ZIP Canvas/ADAPT QTI v1.2 Human-Readable TXT

Click to show Misstated Null Hypotheses for Genetic Ratios example problem

Your lab partner is trying again (eye roll).
You cross two heterozygous individuals (Aa × Aa) and score the offspring phenotypes.
Total offspring scored: 132

Observed data
Category	Ratio	Expected	Observed
Dominant phenotype (A–)	3	99	97
Recessive phenotype (aa)	1	33	35

---

They are setting up a chi-squared (χ²) goodness-of-fit test, but they wrote the hypotheses below:
H₀: The offspring proportions are not consistent with the expected 3:1 ratio (the differences are too large to explain by chance alone).
H_A: The offspring proportions are consistent with the expected 3:1 ratio (any differences from the expected ratio are due to chance).
What is the main problem with their hypotheses?

• A. Nothing is wrong; the hypotheses are stated correctly.
• B. They incorrectly wrote the null hypothesis as an exact match (no random variation).
• C. They used the wrong expected ratio in the hypotheses.
• D. They swapped the null and alternative hypotheses.

Check Answer